What local government is buying
Contracts, awards, bids and purchase orders pulled from the official record of 313 governments — who is spending, on what, and with which company.
103,397Procurement records
$156.23BObserved value
33,498Companies
313Governments
Observed value is the sum of the figures stated on these records, not total government spending: an amendment usually restates the value of the contract it amends, so the same money can appear more than once. Treat it as the size of the record set, not a budget.
Bidding on public work? Get emailed the moment a new solicitation matches your trade.
Create an alert
All categories
Construction 20,595Professional services 14,841Health & social 11,340Public safety 7,827Technology 6,985Vehicles & equipment 4,710Utilities & energy 3,815Real estate 2,646
18 records
Bid Award Recommendation for ITB-25-0532LY - Fencing Services to FRN Corp and Koch Holdings dba All City Fence for as needed services, estimated annual spend of $350,000.00, p… Bid Award Recommendation for ITB-24-0276LY - JH Kelly, LLC and Secondary Contractor (if the Primary is not available): ACCO Engineered Systems Inc. for as needed services, est… Bid Award Recommendation for ITB-25-0545LY - As-Needed Electrical Services - Inside Electricians to AllStar Lighting, dba Lights Inc. and Secondary Contractor (if the Primary … Bid Award Recommendation for ITB-25-0564LY - As-Needed Low Voltage Wiring Services to Primary Contractor Cochran Inc. and Secondary Contractor (if the Primary is not available… Bid Award Recommendation ITB-25-0480JM for Equipment, Snow Removal for Paine Field Airport to M-B Companies in the amount of $1,026,948.75 plus applicable Washington State sal… Bid Award Recommendation ITB 25-0465RB for Piping, Aluminized Metal in the estimated annual amount of $1,500,000.00 to Contech Engineered Solutions, LLC and Pacific Corrugated… Piggyback Award Recommendation for the use of a “piggyback” competitive solicitation via DES contract, through participation with NASPO and Carahsoft Technology Corporation Piggyback Award Recommendation for the use of a “piggyback” competitive solicitation via DES contract 20722, through participation with NASPO and Fisher Scientific Piggyback Award Recommendation for the use of a “piggyback” competitive solicitation via contract #05819 and purchases related to data communication, including Computer Hardwa… Bid Award Recommendation ITB-25-0381RB for Cationic Emulsified Asphalt to McAsphalt Industries Limited for an estimated annual amount of $1,274,800.00, plus applicable Washing… Motion approved 7-0 to amend item number seven under BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED so that it reads: 7. Leverage county resources to build capacity and assist with Food System Plan i… Piggyback Award Recommendation for the use of a “piggyback” competitive solicitation for Playground Equipment, which Washington State Department of Enterprise Services (DES), … Piggyback Award Recommendation for the use of a “piggyback” competitive solicitation via contract 26723 for Production Copiers, which Washington State Department of Enterprise… Piggyback Award Recommendation for the use of a “piggyback” competitive solicitation number GS-35F-011BA for Emergency Notification System issued and awarded by the U.S. Gener… Piggyback Award Recommendation for the use of a “piggyback” competitive solicitation number 03920 for Cab and Chassis and Parts issued and awarded by the Office of Washington … Piggyback Award Recommendation for the use of a “piggyback” competitive solicitation KC000252 issued and awarded by King County to Marios Inc, dba Keeney’s Office Supply for O… Approving Piggyback Award Recommendation for the use of a “piggyback” competitive solicitation via Participating Addendum No. 05116 for RocketChat Licenses and Maintenance, wh… Piggyback Award Recommendation for the use of a “piggyback” competitive solicitation number 25223 for Linen and Laundry Services issued and awarded by Washington State Departm…Amounts and company names are read automatically from the official record titles. They are accurate often enough to be useful and not often enough to be relied on blindly — every row links to the source document, which is authoritative.