Criminal Justice Authority
BOCC Meeting Room 204
Agenda — 41 items
- 1 Call To Order
- 2 Roll Call
- 3 Notice of the meeting was properly posted on March 7, 2025.
- 4 For purposes of this agenda “Action” means any of the following: amending, approving, approving as amended, deferring, denying, giving instructions to staff, making a recommendation to another public body, receiving documents or presentations, referring to committee, reconsidering, re-opening, returning, or striking the item.
- 5 Pledge of Allegiance
- 6 Citizen Participation: Jodie Poplin was called to speak
- 7 Approval of Minutes
- 1. Discussion and possible actions to approve meeting minutes of February 10, 2025.
- 9 Departmental Items:
- 2. Discussion and possible action on the appointment of Paul Timmons as Interim Jail Administrator and Interim Chief Executive Officer, salary to be commensurate with the position, effective February 10, 2025.
- 3. Receive, accept and discuss report by Alan Smith, Chief of Investigations and/or those persons designated by him, regarding operation of and improvements for the Oklahoma County Detention Center, which may include personnel recruitment initiatives, Oklahoma State Health Department matters, medical procedures and matters, budgetary and financial matters, plans for improvement of operation of the Oklahoma County Detention Center, and with possible actions as desired by the Authority.
- 4. Receive, accept, and discuss report by Chief Financial Officer Chris Sherman regarding income statements, financial reports, and current budget for Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority, with possible actions as desired by the Authority.
- 5. Approval of invoices and claims list for March 10, 2025, with discussion and actions as desired by the Authority. List available for inspection in the office of the Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority Secretary, Room 201, Oklahoma County Office Building.
- 6. Approval of a Consulting Services Agreement with John G. Peters, PhD regarding Tavion Murphy v Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority and Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County, USDC, WD Okla., No. CIV-2022-525-SLP.
- 7. Discussion, approval or other action regarding a Corrections Partner Memorandum of Understanding between OCCJA and the National Urban League.
- 8. Discussion and possible action to approve, reject, or modify the engagement agreement with Hinkle & Company for OCCJA’s for the period ending June 30, 2024.
- 9. Discussion and possible action to approve, reject or modify the engagement agreement with Crawford & Associates for the period ending June 30, 2024.
- 10. Report regarding meetings of the Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority Citizens Advisory Board, with discussion and possible acceptance and other actions as desired by the Authority.
- 11. Announcement: Next Regularly Scheduled Meeting of the Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority in 2025 is on Monday, April 14, or as otherwise scheduled or held in accordance with the Oklahoma Open Meetings Act.
- 20 Board Comment/General Remarks
- 21 No New Business
- 22 Executive Session
- 23 Recess into executive session
- 12. To enter executive session pursuant to 25 OS 2021 §307 (B) (4) to consider a pending investigation, claim or action or settlement by contract with the City of Oklahoma City, and its Police Department, because the public body, with the advice of its attorney, determined that disclosure will seriously impair the ability of the public body to process the claim or conduct a pending investigation, litigation, or proceeding in the public interest. Requested by the Chairman.
- 13. To enter executive session pursuant to 25 OS 2021 §307 (B) (4) to consider a pending investigation, claim or action regarding Estate of Stephens v OCCJA, CIV-2023-114-PRW because the public body, with the advice of its attorney, determined that disclosure will seriously impair the ability of the public body to process the claim or conduct a pending investigation, litigation, or proceeding in the public interest. Requested by Rod Heggy, ADA.
- 14. To enter executive session pursuant to 25 OS 2021 §307 (B) (4) to consider a pending investigation, claim or action regarding Altstatt v OCCJA, et al., CIV-2022-811-D because the public body, with the advice of its attorney, determined that disclosure will seriously impair the ability of the public body to process the claim or conduct a pending investigation, litigation, or proceeding in the public interest. Requested by Rod Heggy, ADA.
- 15. To enter executive session pursuant to 25 OS 2021 §307 (B) (4) to consider a pending investigation, claim or action regarding Hawley v OCCJA et al., CIV-2025-151-SLP because the public body, with the advice of its attorney, determined that disclosure will seriously impair the ability of the public body to process the claim or conduct a pending investigation, litigation, or proceeding in the public interest. Requested by Rod Heggy, ADA.
- 16. To enter executive session pursuant to 25 OS 2021 §307 (B) (4) to consider a pending investigation, claim or action regarding Avelar v OCCJA, CIV-2024-909-D because the public body, with the advice of its attorney, determined that disclosure will seriously impair the ability of the public body to process the claim or conduct a pending investigation, litigation, or proceeding in the public interest. Requested by Rod Heggy, ADA.
- 17. To enter executive session pursuant to 25 OS 2021 §307(b)(4) to consider a pending investigation, claim or action regarding Tavion Murphy v Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority and Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County, USDC, WD Okla., No. CIV-2022-525-SLP, because the public body, with the advice of its attorney, determined that disclosure will seriously impair the ability of the public body to process the claim or conduct a pending investigation, litigation, or proceeding in the public interest. Requested by Rod Heggy, ADA.
- 18. To enter into executive session pursuant to 25 O.S. 307 (B) (4) to engage in confidential communications between the public body and its attorney concerning a pending investigation, claim or action, including retention of OSS Law Enforcement Advisors to provide expert witness services in Graham v OCCJA USDC WD Okla, CIV-2023-276-HE, and where on advice of its attorney, the board has determined that disclosure will seriously impair the ability of the public body to process the claim or conduct a pending investigation, litigation, or proceeding in the public interest. Requested by Rod Heggy, ADA.
- 19. To enter into executive session pursuant to 25 O.S. 307 (B) (4) to engage in confidential communications between the public body and its attorney concerning a pending investigation, claim or action, including retention of OSS Law Enforcement Advisors to provide expert witness services in Estate of Yalartal v OCCJA USDC WD Okla, CIV-2023-1181-HE, and where on advice of its attorney, the board has determined that disclosure will seriously impair the ability of the public body to process the claim or conduct a pending investigation, litigation, or proceeding in the public interest. Requested by Rod Heggy, ADA.
- 32 Return from executive session
- 20. Action regarding to consider a pending investigation, claim or action or settlement by contract with the City of Oklahoma City, and its Police Department, because the public body, with the advice of its attorney, determined that disclosure will seriously impair the ability of the public body to process the claim or conduct a pending investigation, litigation, or proceeding in the public interest. Requested by the Chairman.
- 21. Action regarding to consider a pending investigation, claim or action regarding Estate of Stephens v OCCJA, CIV-2023-114-PRW because the public body, with the advice of its attorney, determined that disclosure will seriously impair the ability of the public body to process the claim or conduct a pending investigation, litigation, or proceeding in the public interest. Requested by Rod Heggy, ADA.
- 22. Action regarding to consider a pending investigation, claim or action regarding Altstatt v OCCJA, et al., CIV-2022-811-D because the public body, with the advice of its attorney, determined that disclosure will seriously impair the ability of the public body to process the claim or conduct a pending investigation, litigation, or proceeding in the public interest. Requested by Rod Heggy, ADA.
- 23. Action regarding to consider a pending investigation, claim or action regarding Hawley v OCCJA et al., CIV-2025-151-SLP because the public body, with the advice of its attorney, determined that disclosure will seriously impair the ability of the public body to process the claim or conduct a pending investigation, litigation, or proceeding in the public interest. Requested by Rod Heggy, ADA.
- 24. Action regarding to consider a pending investigation, claim or action regarding Avelar v OCCJA, CIV-2024-909-D because the public body, with the advice of its attorney, determined that disclosure will seriously impair the ability of the public body to process the claim or conduct a pending investigation, litigation, or proceeding in the public interest. Requested by Rod Heggy, ADA.
- 25. Action regarding to consider a pending investigation, claim or action regarding Tavion Murphy v Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority and Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County, USDC, WD Okla., No.CIV-2022-525-SLP, because the public body, with the advice of its attorney, determined that disclosure will seriously impair the ability of the public body to process the claim or conduct a pending investigation, litigation, or proceeding in the public interest. Requested by Rod Heggy, ADA.
- 26. Action regarding to engage in confidential communications between the public body and its attorney concerning a pending investigation, claim or action, including retention of OSS Law Enforcement Advisors to provide expert witness services in Graham v OCCJA USDC WD Okla, CIV-2023-276-HE, and where on advice of its attorney, the board has determined that disclosure will seriously impair the ability of the public body to process the claim or conduct a pending investigation, litigation, or proceeding in the public interest. Request Rod Heggy, ADA.
- 27. Action regarding to engage in confidential communications between the public body and its attorney concerning a pending investigation, claim or action, including retention of OSS Law Enforcement Advisors to provide expert witness services in Estate of Yalartal v OCCJA USDC WD Okla, CIV-2023-1181-HE, and where on advice of its attorney, the board has determined that disclosure will seriously impair the ability of the public body to process the claim or conduct a pending investigation, litigation, or proceeding in the public interest. Requested by Rod Heggy, ADA.
- 41 Adjourn