City Council Meeting
John Ferraro Council Chamber Room 340, City Hall 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Agenda — 14 items
- 1 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the dedication of City-owned real property as Public Street lying on 6141 West Century Boulevard - Right of Way No 36000-10213.
- 2 GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to authority to negotiate and execute a lease agreement with 100 Oceangate, LLC (Oceangate) for the ongoing use of office space and parking for the Office of the City Attorney located at 100 Oceangate, Suite 510, Long Beach, California 90802.
- 3 GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to authority to negotiate and execute an amendment to a parking license agreement with CVFI-444 S Flower, LP (CVFI-444 S Flower) for up to 225 on-site employee parking spaces in the Industrious building located at 444 South Flower Street, Los Angeles, California 90071.
- 4 GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to proposed lease amendment with 350 South Figueroa Street, LLC (350 South Figueroa Street) for office space located at 350 South Figueroa Street, Los Angeles, California 90071 for use by the Los Angeles Police Department’s (LAPD) Office of Inspector General (OIG).
- 5 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Living Wage Ordinance (LWO) and Hotel Worker Minimum Wage Ordinance (HWMO); and adding Article 2.1 and amending Articles 6 and 8 of Chapter XVIII of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC), and amending Articles 10 and 11 of Division 10 of the LAMC to increase the wages and health benefits provided to hotel and airport workers in the City of Los Angeles, to provide training requirements and implement enforcement measures for hotel workers, and other technical changes; and related matters.
- 6 CIVIL RIGHTS, EQUITY, IMMIGRATION AGING AND DISABILITY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the appointment of Ana Karen Estrada to the Commission on the Status of Women.
- 7 Recommendation for Council action:
- 15 MOTION (BLUMENFIELD - HUTT) relative to a personal services contract with Evelyn G. Aleman dba Media Image Public Relations for the provision of expert services to the Third Council District.
- 16 MOTION (HARRIS-DAWSON - PRICE) relative to funding for supplemental community intervention services provided through the Safe Passage Program in Council District Eight (CD 8), currently being provided by Ward Economic Development Corporation under City Contract No. C-144423.
- 17 MOTION (HARRIS-DAWSON - HUTT) relative to funding for contracts for beautification crews in Council District Eight (CD 8).
- 18 MOTION ( HARRIS-DAWSON - HUTT) relative to funding from Council District Eight (CD 8) to supplement the programs and services associated with the Enhanced Summer Night Lights program, currently being provided by the Brotherhood Crusade under City Contract No. C-138622, for an extended period from June 30, 2025 to June 30, 2026.
- 19 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION (NAZARIAN – YAROSLAVSKY) to include in the City's 2025-26 State Legislative Program a position on any legislation that seeks to undermine the City's jurisdictional control over its utility assets.
- 20 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION (NAZARIAN – McOSKER) relative to including the City’s position in the 2025-2026 State and Federal Legislative Programs opposition to legislation or administrative actions that would undermine Los Angeles Department of Water and Power’s (LADWP) right to operate as an independent balancing authority, diminish its control over its transmission assets or its rights to transmission assets over which it has ownership or in which it has as stake, and/or impose additional charges or costs for the transmission of electricity for LADWP Power System customers.
- 21 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) and (e)(2), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the threat of litigation concerning the All-Electric Building Standards in Ordinance No. 187,714, under the case entitled California Restaurant Association v. City of Berkeley .